Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions [ 100% FREE ]

The world of competitive exams is vast, and within this expansive realm, one topic that continues to gain importance is “Statement and Argument“. For those new to the term or even those familiar with it, it’s essential to dive deep into what exactly “Statement and Argument” encompasses. In many government examinations, the “Statement and Argument” section plays a pivotal role, testing candidates on their logical reasoning capabilities. Understanding the nuances of this topic can significantly boost one’s chances of scoring well.

Every “Statement and Argument” question presents a unique challenge. At its core, “Statement and Argument” revolves around phrases, clauses, and sentences, all of which culminate in a conclusion. But what sets it apart? The answer lies in the hidden premises, also known as assumptions, that are inherent in arguments. These nuances are what make understanding “Statement and Argument” crucial for aspirants.

Now, when it comes to the types of questions you might encounter, the “statement and argument questions” are diverse in nature. Whether you’re practicing “statements and arguments questions”, trying to understand an “argument statement”, or even looking to grasp “statement and argument in Hindi”, there’s a vast world to explore. Furthermore, there are several “statement and argument tricks” that can be employed to tackle these questions efficiently and effectively.

In the sections that follow, we’ll delve deeper into the practice set of questions for “Statement and Argument“, offering insights and tips to conquer this section. So, if you’ve ever found yourself puzzled by a statement and argument question, rest assured, you’re in the right place.

Equip yourself with the understanding and skills to approach each “statement and argument question” with confidence and clarity. Whether you’re seeking understanding in English or “statement and argument in Hindi”, this comprehensive guide promises to shed light on all facets of the “Statement and Argument” topic.

Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions :

Directions :(61-70) Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

61. Statement : Should trade unions be banned completely?
Arguments :
I. Yes. Workers can concentrate on production.
II. No. This is the only way through which employees can put their demands before the management.
III. Yes. Employees get their illegal demands fulfilled through these unions.
IV. No. Trade unions are not banned in other economically advanced countries.


Option “A” is correct.
Clearly, trade unions provide a common platform for the workers to voice their demands and protests and thus ensure that they are not subdued or exploited. So, argument II holds strong, while I and III do not. Besides, the idea of imitation of other countries in the implementation of a certain policy holds no relevance. So, argument IV also does not hold strong.

62. Statement : Should the public sector undertakings be kilo wed to adopt hire and fire policy?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will help the public sector undertakings to get rid of non-performing employees and reward the performing employees.
II. No. This will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.
III. Yes. This will help increase the level of efficiency of these organizations and these will become profitable establishments.


Option “D” is correct.
‘Hire and fire policy’ implies ‘taking up the performing employees and discarding the non-performing ones’. Clearly, such a policy would stand out to encourage employees to work hard and devotedly to retain their jobs and thus enhance productivity and profitability of the organizations. So, both arguments I and III hold strong. Argument II seems to be vague in the light of this.

63. Statement : Is caste-based reservation policy in professional colleges justified?
Arguments :
I. Yes. The step is a must to bring the underprivileged at par with the privileged ones.
II. No. It obstructs the establishment of a classless society.
III. Yes. This will help the backward castes and classes of people to come out of the oppression of upper caste people.


Option “B” is correct.
Clearly, capability is an essential criteria for a profession and reservation cannot ensure capable workers. So, neither I nor III holds strong. However, making one caste more privileged than the other through reservations would hinder the objectives of a classless society. So, argument II holds strong.

64. Statement : Should there be a complete ban on genetically modified imported seeds?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will boost the demand of domestically developed seeds.
II. No. This is the only way to increase production substantially.
III. Yes. Genetically modified products will adversely affect the health of those who consume these products.

Option “B” is correct.
Genetically modified imported seeds have been specially formulated to increase the yield and quality of produce. So, argument II is strong. Besides, increase in production holds much more significance than the sale of domestically produced seeds. Thus, argument I does not hold. Also, the genetically modified seeds result in a producer of finer quality which is no way harmful to the consumer. So, III also does not hold strong.

65. Statement : Should the income generated out of agricultural activities be taxed?
Arguments :
I. No. Farmers are otherwise suffering from natural calamities and low yield coupled with low procurement price and their income should not be taxed.
II. Yes. Majority of the population is dependent on agriculture and hence their income should be taxed to augment the resources.
III. Yes. Many big farmers earn much more than the majority of the service earners and they should be taxed to remove the disparity.

Option “C” is correct.
Clearly, if the income of farmers is not adequate, they cannot be brought under the net of taxation as per rules governing the Income Tax Act. So, I is not strong. Besides, a major part of the population is dependent on agriculture and such a large section, if taxed even with certain concessions, would draw in huge funds, into the government coffers. Also, many big landlords with substantially high incomes from agriculture are taking undue advantage of this benefit. So, both arguments II and III hold strong.

66. Statement : Should there be only few banks in place of numerous smaller banks in India?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will help secure the investor’s money as these big banks will be able to withstand intermittent market related shocks.
II. No. A large number of people will lose their jobs as after the merger many employees will be redundant.
III. Yes. This will help consolidate the entire banking industry and will lead to healthy competition.


Option “A” is correct.
The security of the investor’s money is not related to the size of the bank. Besides even after consolidation, the number of investors, their amounts and hence the duties shall remain the same and so no employees will be redundant. Reducing the number of smaller banks will also not affect the mutual competition among the banks. Thus, none of the arguments holds strong.

67.Statement : Should religion be taught in our schools?
Arguments :
I. No. Ours is a secular state.
II. Yes. Teaching religion helps inculcate moral values among children.
III. No. How can one dream of such a step when we want the young generation to fulfil its role in the 21st century.


Option “D” is correct.
Ours is a secular state does not mean that religion and religious values should be eradicated. In fact, these inculcate moral values. So, argument I is vague while argument II is strong. Also, teaching religion can in no way hinder the student’s capability to face the challenges of the 21st century.

68. Statement : Should the parliamentary elections in India be held every three years as against five years at present?
Arguments :
I. No. This will enhance wastage of money and resources.
II. Yes. This will help the voters to change non-performing representatives without much delay.
III. No. The elected representatives will not have enough time to settle and concentrate on developmental activities.


Option “D” is correct.
The election process entails exorbitant expenditure. So, holding elections very often will surely lead to wastage of money and resources. Thus, I holds strong. Also, the elected representatives need a considerable period of time to implement their policies and also convince the voters of their working. So, III holds strong while II does not.

69. Statement : Should the number of holidays of government employees be reduced?
Arguments :
I. Yes. Our government employees are having the maximum number of holidays among the countries of the world.
II. Yes. It is a sign of British legacy, why should we carry it further?
III. Yes. It will speed up work and all the pending jobs can be completed well in time.
IV. No. Employees must be given ample spare time to spend with their family.


Option “D” is correct.
Reducing the number of holidays just because no other country gives so many holidays or it is a feature of a certain system which we have renounced, does not seem convincing. So, neither I nor II holds strong. However, this step would surely help to reduce the backlog of pending cases and dispense with the new cases much more quickly than before. So, III holds strong. Even if the holidays are reduced, only the avoidable or seemingly unnecessary ones shall be cut short and the national holidays shall still remain to enjoy. So, IV also does not hold.

70. Statement : Should class IV children have Board examination?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will motivate the children to study and get higher marks, and thus more knowledge can be imbibed at a younger age.
II. No. The children will be forced to study and won’t enjoy the process.
III. Yes. In today’s competitive world the children need to be prepared right from the beginning to face such difficult examinations.
IV. No. This will add pressure on tender aged children and leave very little time for them to play.


Option “C” is correct.
Young children of class IV ought to be taught the basic fundamentals of subjects in a gradual process via practical examples and practice in a playful manner. They need not be made to study through compulsion and their age is not such as to bear the tension and burden of examinations. So, both II and IV hold strong. However, facing examinations at this stage shall prepare them to tackle the competitions in later life. So, III also holds. However, holding examinations cannot motivate such young and immature students, neither is it a way to make them learn more. So, I does not hold strong.

In the vast expanse of competitive exam preparation, one can’t stress enough the importance of the “Statement and Argument” section. This specific area, a cornerstone in logical reasoning, offers both a challenge and an opportunity to aspirants. If you’ve journeyed through various topics, it’s evident that understanding “Statement and Argument” is not just about reading and memorizing. It’s about grasping the core essence, building a logical approach, and utilizing the right tricks to tackle each question efficiently.

Every “statement and argument question” is, in its own way, a puzzle waiting to be solved. When faced with such questions, an aspirant is not just deciphering words but is also weaving through hidden premises or assumptions. It’s like a dance of logic where every move, every “argument statement”, leads to a coherent conclusion. The dance becomes more intricate when delving into “statements and arguments questions”, where the nuances play a pivotal role in guiding the logical path.

While many resources can help in mastering this section, the true essence of “Statement and Argument” lies in practice and understanding. The more “statement and argument questions” one solves, the clearer the pattern becomes. With every question tackled, the aspirant becomes adept at identifying the assumptions and arriving at conclusions.

But what about those who are more comfortable with languages other than English? Here’s the good news. The core concepts of “Statement and Argument” remain universal. Hence, even if one seeks to understand “statement and argument in Hindi”, the principles remain consistent. Language is merely a medium; the underlying logic remains unchanged. Whether in English or Hindi, the goal remains the same: to interpret the given statements, discern the arguments, and arrive at a logical conclusion.

Moreover, as with any challenge, there are always tricks to make the journey smoother. The world of “statement and argument” is no exception. By leveraging “statement and argument tricks”, one can expedite the process of understanding and answering. These tricks aren’t shortcuts but rather strategies to approach the questions more efficiently. They offer ways to quickly identify assumptions, dissect arguments, and find the most logical path to the conclusion.

In wrapping up, it’s essential to remember that mastery in “Statement and Argument” doesn’t come overnight. It requires persistent practice, a keen understanding of the nuances, and the right strategies. Whether you’re starting your preparation journey or are deep into it, never underestimate the value of revisiting the basics. Each revisit reinforces the concepts, making you better equipped to face any “statement and argument question” that comes your way.

As you move forward, keep practicing, keep questioning, and keep refining your approach. The world of “Statement and Argument” is vast, but with dedication and the right resources, it’s a world that every aspirant can conquer. Here’s to mastering the dance of logic, understanding every statement, and crafting the perfect argument.

fr_FRFrench