Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions [ 100% FREE ]
The world of competitive exams is vast, and within this expansive realm, one topic that continues to gain importance is “Statement and Argument“. For those new to the term or even those familiar with it, it’s essential to dive deep into what exactly “Statement and Argument” encompasses. In many government examinations, the “Statement and Argument” section plays a pivotal role, testing candidates on their logical reasoning capabilities. Understanding the nuances of this topic can significantly boost one’s chances of scoring well.
Every “Statement and Argument” question presents a unique challenge. At its core, “Statement and Argument” revolves around phrases, clauses, and sentences, all of which culminate in a conclusion. But what sets it apart? The answer lies in the hidden premises, also known as assumptions, that are inherent in arguments. These nuances are what make understanding “Statement and Argument” crucial for aspirants.
Now, when it comes to the types of questions you might encounter, the “statement and argument questions” are diverse in nature. Whether you’re practicing “statements and arguments questions”, trying to understand an “argument statement”, or even looking to grasp “statement and argument in Hindi”, there’s a vast world to explore. Furthermore, there are several “statement and argument tricks” that can be employed to tackle these questions efficiently and effectively.
In the sections that follow, we’ll delve deeper into the practice set of questions for “Statement and Argument“, offering insights and tips to conquer this section. So, if you’ve ever found yourself puzzled by a statement and argument question, rest assured, you’re in the right place.
Equip yourself with the understanding and skills to approach each “statement and argument question” with confidence and clarity. Whether you’re seeking understanding in English or “statement and argument in Hindi”, this comprehensive guide promises to shed light on all facets of the “Statement and Argument” topic.
Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions :
Directions :(11-20) Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.
11. Statement : Should judiciary be independent of the executive? Arguments : I. Yes. This would help curb the unlawful activities of the executive. II. No. The executive would not be able to take bold measures.
Option “A” is correct. Clearly, independent judiciary is necessary for impartial judgement so that the Executive does not take wrong measures. So, only argument I holds.
12. Statement : Should all the practising doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost? Arguments : I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing? II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.
Option “B” is correct. A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong. Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed ‘undemocratic’. So, I is vague.
13. Statement : Should students take part in politics? Arguments : I. Yes. It inculcates in them qualities of leadership. II. No. They should study and build up their career.
Option “C” is correct. Clearly, indulgement in politics trains the students for future leadership but It sways them from the studies. So, either of the arguments I or II can hold.
14. Statement : Should the opinion polls predicting outcome of elections before the elections be banned in India? Arguments : I. Yes. This may affect the voters mind and may affect the outcome. II. No. Such polls are conducted all over the world.
Option “C” is correct. The opinion polls may influence the thinking of an individual and thus divert his mind from his original choice. So, argument I holds strong. Further, blindly imitating a policy followed by other countries holds no relevance. So, argument II is vague.
15. Statement : Should the political parties be banned? Arguments : I. Yes. It is necessary to teach a lesson to the politicians. II. No. It will lead to an end of democracy.
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Option “D” is correct. Clearly, with the ban on political parties, candidates can independently contest elections. So, it will not end democracy. Thus, argument II does not hold. Argument I does not give a strong reason.
16. Statement : Should all the colleges in India be allowed to devise their own curriculum and syllabus for the vocational courses promoting self-employment? Arguments : I. Yes. This is an important step to generate employment opportunities. II. No. This will affect the quality of education due to lack of uniformity in syllabus.
Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Option “A” is correct. Clearly, colleges, if given a free hand, would through individual efforts come up with fresh, competent courses to draw in more students. This would open up new avenues for employment. So, argument I holds strong. In the light of this, argument II appears to be vague.
17.Statement : Should agriculture in rural India be mechanized? Arguments : I. Yes. It would lead to higher production. II. No. Many villagers would be left unemployed.
Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Option “A” is correct. Clearly, mechanization would speed up the work and increase the production. So, argument I is strong enough. Argument II is vague because mechanization will only eliminate wasteful employment, not create unemployment.
18. Statement : Should there be concentration of foreign investment in only few states? Arguments : I. No. It is against the policy of overall development of the country. II. Yes. A large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment.
Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Option “A” is correct. An equitable distribution of foreign investment is a must for uniform development all over the country. So, argument I holds. Also, no backward state ought to be neglected, rather such states should be prepared and shaped up to attract. Foreign investment as well. So, II does not hold.
19. Statement : Should the oil companies be allowed to fix the price of petroleum products depending on market conditions? Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to make the oil companies commercially viable. II. No. This will put additional burden on the retail prices of essential commodities and will cause a lot of hardships to the masses.
Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Option “B” is correct. Clearly, oil is an essential commodity and its prices govern the prices of other essential commodities. As such, the interest of the common people must be taken care of, rather than the profitability of some oil companies. So, only argument II holds strong.
20. Statement : Should the education at all levels be offered only in vernacular medium? Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to enhance performance of the students. II. No. This will severely affect acquiring knowledge for want of good text books in vernacular medium.
Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Option “B” is correct. Teaching in vernacular medium would surely make it easy for students to grasp. But the use of ‘only’ in argument I makes it invalid. Also, teaching in international language would open up more avenues for students – in procuring books and study material, in going abroad for studies as well as taking up jobs which require interaction with people of different nationalities. So, argument II holds strong,