Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions [ 100% FREE ]

The world of competitive exams is vast, and within this expansive realm, one topic that continues to gain importance is “Statement and Argument“. For those new to the term or even those familiar with it, it’s essential to dive deep into what exactly “Statement and Argument” encompasses. In many government examinations, the “Statement and Argument” section plays a pivotal role, testing candidates on their logical reasoning capabilities. Understanding the nuances of this topic can significantly boost one’s chances of scoring well.

Every “Statement and Argument” question presents a unique challenge. At its core, “Statement and Argument” revolves around phrases, clauses, and sentences, all of which culminate in a conclusion. But what sets it apart? The answer lies in the hidden premises, also known as assumptions, that are inherent in arguments. These nuances are what make understanding “Statement and Argument” crucial for aspirants.

Now, when it comes to the types of questions you might encounter, the “statement and argument questions” are diverse in nature. Whether you’re practicing “statements and arguments questions”, trying to understand an “argument statement”, or even looking to grasp “statement and argument in Hindi”, there’s a vast world to explore. Furthermore, there are several “statement and argument tricks” that can be employed to tackle these questions efficiently and effectively.

In the sections that follow, we’ll delve deeper into the practice set of questions for “Statement and Argument“, offering insights and tips to conquer this section. So, if you’ve ever found yourself puzzled by a statement and argument question, rest assured, you’re in the right place.

Equip yourself with the understanding and skills to approach each “statement and argument question” with confidence and clarity. Whether you’re seeking understanding in English or “statement and argument in Hindi”, this comprehensive guide promises to shed light on all facets of the “Statement and Argument” topic.

Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions :

Directions :(21-30) Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

21. Statement : Should those who receive dowry, despite the law prohibiting it, be punished?
Arguments :
I. Yes. Those who violate the law must be punished.
II. No. Dowry system is firmly rooted in the society since time immemorial.


Option “A” is correct.
Clearly, laws are made to ensure that no person pursues the practice. So, persons who violate the laws need to be punished. Thus, argument I holds. A wrong practice, no matter how firmly rooted, needs to be ended. So, argument II is vague.

22. Statement : Is the Government justified in spending so much on defence?
Arguments :
I. Yes. Safety of the country is of prime importance.
II. No. During peace, this money could be used for the development of the country.


Option “A” is correct.
Clearly, defence is necessary for the safety of the country, which is of prime importance. So, argument I holds. Also, a country can concentrate on internal progress and development only when it is safe from external aggressions. So, argument II does not hold.

23. Statement : Should girls learn arts like judo and karate?
Arguments :
I. Yes. It will enable them to defend themselves from rogues and ruffians.
II. No. They will lose their feminine grace.


Option “A” is correct.
Learning martial arts is necessary for girls for self-defence. So, argument I holds. However, argument II is vague since a training in these arts has nothing to do with their feminine grace.

24. Statement : Should India develop a national water grid by connecting all the rivers in the country?
Arguments :
I. No. This is not just possible as we do not have the technical knowhow.
II. Yes, this will greatly help the entire country by effectively channelizing the excess water to the areas having shortage.


Option “B” is correct.
A single network of all the rivers in the country would surely enable a good distribution of water to all areas, So, argument II holds strong. Also, a policy beneficial to the nation cannot be hindered owing to lack of knowhow. Ways can be devised to build up such a network. So, argument I is vague.

25. Statement : Should individuals/institutes having treasures of national significance like Nobel Prizes, hand them over to the Central Government for their safe custody?
Arguments :
I. Yes. The individuals or institutions do not have enough resources to protect them.
II. No. These are the property of the individuals/institutions who win them and should be in their custody.


Option “B” is correct.
Clearly, the awards are given for individual excellence and perfection. So, only argument II holds strong.

26. Statement : Should the council of ministers once appointed be kept the same for the entire period intervening two elections?
Arguments :
I. No. Shuffling of ministers and portfolios is a healthy democratic process.
II. Yes. The ministers do not get a hold on their portfolio unless they are kept for a longer duration.


Option “D” is correct.
Shuffling of Cabinet ministers is just not a regular process, but a step to ensure proper working and implementation of schemes and avoid corruption. So, none of the arguments holds strong.

27.Statement : Should people with educational qualification higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs?
Arguments :
I. No. It will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
II. Yes. It creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
III. No. This goes against the basic rights of the individuals.
IV. Yes. This will increase productivity.


Option “D” is correct.
The issue discussed in the statement is nowhere related to increase in unemployment, as the number of vacancies filled in will remain the same. Also, in a working place, it is the performance of the individual that matters and that makes him more or less wanted, and not his educational qualifications. So, neither I nor II holds strong. Besides, the needs of a job are laid down in the desired qualifications for the job. So, recruitment of more qualified people cannot augment productivity. Thus, IV also does not hold strong. However, it is the right of an individual to get the post for which he fulfils the eligibility criteria, whatever be his extra merits. Hence, argument III holds strong.

28. Statement : Should India go in for computerization in all possible sectors?
Arguments :
I. Yes. It will bring efficiency and accuracy in the work.
II. No. It will be an injustice to the monumental human resources which are at present underutilized.
III. No. Computerization demands a lot of money. We should not waste money on it.
IV. Yes. When advanced countries are introducing computers in every field, how can India afford to lag behind?


Option “A” is correct.
Clearly, the need of today is to put to better use the underutilized human resources. Computers with better and speedy efficiency can accomplish this. So, argument I holds, while II does not. Computerization is a much beneficial project and investment in it is not at all a waste. So, III is not strong. Further, development in a new field is not a matter of merely following up other countries. So, IV also does not hold strong.

29. Statement : Should all the school teachers be debarred from giving private tuitions?
Arguments :
I. No. The needy students will be deprived of the expertise of these teachers.
II. Yes. This is an injustice to the unemployed educated people who can earn their living by giving tuitions.
III. Yes. Only then the quality of teaching in schools will improve.
IV. Yes. Now salary of these teachers is reasonable.


Option “D” is correct.
Only III is strong. The lure of earning private tuitions reduces the efforts and devotion of the teachers towards the students in schools. So, if tuitions are banned, students can benefit from their teachers’ knowledge in the school itself. So, argument III holds strong while I does not. However, a person cannot be barred from earning more just because he already has a good salary. So, argument IV is vague. Further, the unemployed people thriving on tuitions can survive with the school teachers holding tuitions too, if they are capable enough to guide the students well. So, argument II also does not hold strong.

30. Statement : Should education be made compulsory for all children up to the age of 14?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will help to eradicate the system of forced employment of these children.
II. Yes. This is an effective way to make the entire population educated.
III. No. We do not have adequate infrastructure to educate the entire population.
IV. Yes. This would increase the standard of living.


Option “D” is correct.
Clearly, today’s children are to make up future citizens of the country and so it is absolutely essential to make them learned, more responsible, more innovative and self-dependent by imparting them education. So, argument II holds strong while I and IV do not. Besides, the goal of literacy cannot be denied for want of infrastructure. So, argument III also does not hold.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7