Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions [ 100% FREE ]

The world of competitive exams is vast, and within this expansive realm, one topic that continues to gain importance is “Statement and Argument“. For those new to the term or even those familiar with it, it’s essential to dive deep into what exactly “Statement and Argument” encompasses. In many government examinations, the “Statement and Argument” section plays a pivotal role, testing candidates on their logical reasoning capabilities. Understanding the nuances of this topic can significantly boost one’s chances of scoring well.

Every “Statement and Argument” question presents a unique challenge. At its core, “Statement and Argument” revolves around phrases, clauses, and sentences, all of which culminate in a conclusion. But what sets it apart? The answer lies in the hidden premises, also known as assumptions, that are inherent in arguments. These nuances are what make understanding “Statement and Argument” crucial for aspirants.

Now, when it comes to the types of questions you might encounter, the “statement and argument questions” are diverse in nature. Whether you’re practicing “statements and arguments questions”, trying to understand an “argument statement”, or even looking to grasp “statement and argument in Hindi”, there’s a vast world to explore. Furthermore, there are several “statement and argument tricks” that can be employed to tackle these questions efficiently and effectively.

In the sections that follow, we’ll delve deeper into the practice set of questions for “Statement and Argument“, offering insights and tips to conquer this section. So, if you’ve ever found yourself puzzled by a statement and argument question, rest assured, you’re in the right place.

Equip yourself with the understanding and skills to approach each “statement and argument question” with confidence and clarity. Whether you’re seeking understanding in English or “statement and argument in Hindi”, this comprehensive guide promises to shed light on all facets of the “Statement and Argument” topic.

Top 70 Statement and Argument Questions :

Directions :(41-50) Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

41. Statement : Should cutting of trees be banned altogether?
Arguments :
I. Yes. It is very much necessary to do so to restore ecological balance.
II. No. A total ban would harm timber based industries.

Option “E” is correct.
Clearly, trees play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and so must be preserved. So, argument I holds. Also, trees form the basic source of timber and a complete ban on cutting of trees would harm timber based industries. So, only a controlled cutting of trees should be allowed and the loss replenished by planting more trees. So, argument II is also valid.

42. Statement : Should there be a restriction on the migration of people from one state to another state in India?
Arguments :
I. No. Any Indian citizen has a basic right to stay at any place of his/her choice and hence they cannot be stopped.
II. Yes. This is the way to effect an equitable distribution of resources across the states in India.


Option “A” is correct.
Clearly, argument I holds strong, while argument II is vague.

43. Statement : Should all refugees, who make unauthorized entry into a country, be forced to go back to their homeland?
Arguments :
I. Yes. They make their colonies and occupy a lot of land.
II. No. They leave their homes because of hunger or some terror and on human grounds, should not be forced to go back.


Option “B” is correct.
Clearly, refugees are people forced out of their homeland by some misery and need shelter desperately. So, argument II holds. Argument I against the statement is vague.

44. Statement : Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face difficult situations in future?
Arguments :
I. No. There is no need to block huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money idle.
II. Yes. This will help India withstand shocks of sudden rise in oil prices due to unforeseen circumstances.


Option “B” is correct.
Oil, being an essential commodity, our country must keep it in reserve. So, argument I is vague, while argument II holds as it provides a substantial reason for the same.

45. Statement : Should there be more than one High Court in each state in India?
Arguments :
I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers’ money.
II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.


Option “B” is correct.
Clearly, an increase in the number of High Courts will surely speed up the work and help to do away with the pending cases. So, argument II holds strong. In light of this, the expenditure incurred would be ‘utilization’, not ‘wastage’ of money. So, argument I does not hold.

46. Statement : Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India?
Arguments :
I. No. It denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run.
II. No. It is against the principle of equality, does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?


Option “E” is correct.
Merit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all – these three factors, if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfil the objectives of the Constitution. Thus, both the arguments hold strong.

47.Statement : Should the vehicles older than 15 years be rejected in metros in India?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This is a significant step to lower down the pollution level in metros.
II. No. It will be very difficult for vehicle owners to shift to other parts in country because they will not get suitable job for their very existence.


Option “A” is correct.
Clearly, 15 year old vehicles are not Euro-compliant and hence cause much more pollution than the recent ones. So, argument I holds. Argument II is vague since owners of these vehicles need not shift themselves. They might sell off their vehicles and buy new ones – a small price which every citizen can afford for a healthy environment.

48. Statement : Should the tuition fees in all post-graduate courses be hiked considerably?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will bring in some sense of seriousness among the students and will improve the quality.
II. No. This will force the meritorious poor students to stay away from post-graduate courses.


Option “B” is correct.
A hike in fees is no means to make the students more serious in studies. So, argument I is vague. However, with the increase in fees, poor meritorious students would not be able to afford post-graduate studies. So, argument II holds.

49. Statement : Should the persons below the age of 18 years be allowed to join armed forces?
Arguments :
I. No. Persons below the age of 18 do not attain both physical and mental maturity to shoulder such burden.
II. Yes. This will help the country develop its armed forces which will serve the country for a longer time.


Option “A” is correct.
The armed forces must consist of physically strong and mentally mature individuals to take care of defence properly. So, argument I holds strong. Clearly, argument II holds no relevance.

50. Statement : Should all the infrastructural development projects in India be handed over to the private sector?
Arguments :
I. No. The private sector entities are not equipped to handle such projects.
II. Yes. Such projects are handled by private sector in the developed countries.


Option “D” is correct.
Clearly, such projects if handed over to the private sector shall be given to a competent authority. So, argument I is vague. Also, imitating a policy on the basis that it worked out successfully in other countries holds no relevance. Thus, argument II also does not hold strong.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7