Diving into the world of competitive exams requires one to be acquainted with various topics, and one of the standout topics that often demands attention is “Statement and Conclusion“. When it comes to logical and analytical reasoning, especially in the banking sector exams, the “Statement and Conclusion” section is frequently on the spotlight. This specific topic can be a game-changer for many aspirants, as understanding the nuances of the “Statement and Conclusion” can significantly elevate one’s chances of success.
So, what exactly does the “Statement and Conclusion” entail? At its core, it involves a given statement followed by one or multiple conclusions. The primary task for candidates is to gauge the theme of the statement and comprehend the context within which the conclusions have been drawn. As the name suggests, the “statement and conclusion” segment requires a sharp understanding of the statement provided, after which the conclusion should be assessed based on its logical connection to the statement.
Interestingly, while the idea might sound straightforward, mastering the “Statement and Conclusion” is no easy feat. It is not just about reading the statement, but about making logical connections. Often, “statement and conclusion questions” come with more than just one conclusion. In certain cases, “two statements are given followed by two conclusions”, presenting an added layer of complexity. These questions are not merely about reading comprehension; they are about analytical prowess, where candidates sift through the information and filter out the most logical conclusions.
However, a common pitfall many aspirants fall into when tackling “statement and conclusion questions” is making unwarranted assumptions. This can be a critical mistake, as the essence of “Statement and Conclusion” lies in understanding the given statement and drawing conclusions based solely on it. Bringing in external assumptions can often lead to incorrect answers.
For those who are multilingual and may be seeking resources, understanding the “statement and conclusion in Hindi” can offer a deeper insight. Additionally, there are certain “statement and conclusion tricks” that can aid in quickly deciphering the logical connections, and when utilized effectively, they can save valuable time during the examination.
In summation, the “Statement and Conclusion” topic is an integral part of logical reasoning in competitive exams. Whether you’re delving into “statement conclusion questions” or trying to decode the nuances between the statement and its subsequent conclusion, mastering this section can truly be a defining factor in achieving success in competitive examinations.
Top 70 Statement and Conclusion Questions :
31. All the books, written by Prabhakar, are textbooks. Some of his books are published by ABC Publishing Company.
Some textbooks written by Prabhakar are published by publishers other than ABC Publishing Company.
ABC Publishing Company publishes some critical essays written by Prabhakar.
All the books published by ABC Publishing Company have been written by Prabhakar.
Option “B” is correct. Some textbooks written by Prabhakar are published by publishers other than ABC Publishing Company.
32. All students in my class are bright. Manish is not bright.
Some students are not bright.
Manish must work hard.
Non-bright ones are not students.
Manish is not a student of my class.
Option “D” is correct. Manish is not a student of my class.
33. During the Puja days’, people visit those houses where ‘puja’ is performed. They make it a point to go even if they are not invited. Manmohan visited the house of Keshav, his office colleague, during ‘puja days’.
Keshav had invited Manmohan for some other function
Manmohan, being a religious man, went to Keshav’s house uninvited.
In Keshav’s house, ‘puja’ was performed.
Manmohan was invited by Keshav.
Option “D” is correct. Manmohan was invited by Keshav.
34. All guilty politicians were arrested. Kishan and Chander were among those arrested.
All politicians are guilty.
All arrested people are politicians.
Kishan and Chander were not politicians.
Kishan and Chander were guilty.
Option “D” is correct. Kishan and Chander were guilty.
35. In the university examination, most of the candidates write in Hindi medium.
Some candidates of this examination write in Hindi.
Mostly candidates with Hindi medium appear in this examination.
In this examination no candidate writes answers in medium other than Hindi,
All the candidates who appear in this examination write answers in Hindi.
Option “B” is correct. Mostly candidates with Hindi medium appear in this examination.
36. Statements : In a one day cricket match, the total runs made by a team were 200. Out of these 160 runs were made by spinners. Conclusions : I. 80% of the team consists of spinners. II. The opening batsmen were spinners.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Option “D” is correct. According to the statement, 80% of the total runs were made by spinners. So, I does not follow. Nothing about the opening batsmen is mentioned in the statement. So, II also does not follow.
37.If Raman borrowed some amount at the rate of 15% per annum on SI charged after every 4 months and in 44 months he pays total interest of Rs.16500, then how much amount Raman borrowed?
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Option “A” is correct. Clearly, I directly follows from the given statement. Also, it is mentioned that old ideas are replaced by new ones, as thinking changes with the progressing time. So, II does not follow.
38. Statements : Government has spoiled many top ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions. Conclusions : I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance. II. The Director of the financial institute should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Option “E” is correct. According to the statement, Government has spoiled financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors. This means that only those persons should be appointed as Directors who are experts in finance and are acquainted with the financial work of the institute. So, both I and II follow.
39. Statements : Population increase coupled with depleting resources is going to be the scenario of many developing countries in days to come. Conclusions : I. The population of developing countries will not continue to increase in future. II. It will be very difficult for the governments of developing countries to provide its people decent quality of life.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Option “B” is correct. The fact given in I is quite contrary to the given statement. So, I does not follow. II mentions the direct implications of the state discussed in the statement. Thus, II follows.
40. Statements : Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers. Conclusions : I. Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised. II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV. on the readership of newspapers.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Option “D” is correct. The statement concentrates on the increasing viewership of TV. and does not stress either on increasing the readership of newspapers or making studies regarding the same. So, neither I nor II follows.