SV
StudyVirus
Get our free app!Download Free

Moderates, Extremists & Lal-Bal-Pal — Set 6

National Movement · उदारवादी, उग्रवादी और लाल-बाल-पाल · Questions 5160 of 160

00
0/10
1

What was the British response to the extremist movement?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. They used sedition laws to imprison extremist leaders like Tilak

The British response to the extremist movement was to use sedition laws and the colonial legal system to prosecute and imprison extremist leaders. Tilak was tried in 1897 and 1908, Bipin Chandra Pal was imprisoned for refusing to testify in Tilak's case, and Lala Lajpat Rai was deported to Burma in 1907. Aurobindo Ghosh was tried in the Alipore Bomb Case. These prosecutions paradoxically increased the popularity of those prosecuted and strengthened the extremist cause.

2

What was Tilak's view on religion and nationalism?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. He used Hindu festivals and symbols to mobilize mass nationalist sentiment

Bal Gangadhar Tilak believed that Hindu festivals and symbols could be powerful tools for mobilizing mass nationalist sentiment. He transformed the Ganesh Chaturthi festival and organized the Shivaji festival as platforms for nationalist speeches and community gatherings. He drew on Hindu religious sentiment to create a sense of national identity and pride. This approach was criticized by some as excluding Muslims and contributing to communal tensions, but it was highly effective in mobilizing ordinary Hindus.

3

What differentiated Lal-Bal-Pal from other Indian political leaders?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. They demanded complete independence through mass action, not gradual reform

Lal-Bal-Pal — Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, and Bipin Chandra Pal — distinguished themselves by demanding complete independence (Swaraj) through mass agitation, boycott, and swadeshi, rather than the gradual reform approach of the moderates. They believed in involving the masses in nationalist politics, not just the educated elite. They rejected the idea that India had to 'earn' independence through good behavior. Their approach represented a fundamentally different vision of how independence should be achieved.

4

What was the significance of Annie Besant and Tilak's combined Home Rule movement?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. It brought together diverse Indians demanding self-rule and influenced the August 1917 Declaration

Annie Besant's and Tilak's combined Home Rule Leagues (founded 1916) were significant because they brought together diverse sections of Indian society — including those who had not been active in the INC — in demanding self-rule for India. The movement created a new energy in Indian politics during World War I. The British response of interning Besant generated such outrage that the British government announced the August 1917 Declaration promising progressive self-governance, showing the movement had an impact.

5

What was the first time extremists fully dominated the INC?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. The 1906 Calcutta session where Swaraj and Swadeshi were adopted

The 1906 Calcutta session of the INC, presided by Dadabhai Naoroji, was the first time the extremists achieved a major victory by getting the four resolutions of Swaraj, Swadeshi, Boycott, and National Education adopted. The extremists had successfully pushed the INC toward a more radical program. However, the moderates retained organizational control, which led to the confrontation at the 1907 Surat session. The 1906 session represented the high point of extremist influence before the split.

6

What was the Congress's position at the time of the Lucknow Pact 1916?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. Both factions had reunited and the Congress represented a unified national movement again

By the time of the Lucknow Pact in 1916, the Congress had been reunited with Tilak leading the extremists back into the fold. This was a significant moment because the national movement could once again present a unified front. The Lucknow Pact simultaneously brought the Muslim League into cooperation with the Congress, creating the broadest nationalist coalition yet. This unity was crucial in pressing the British for reforms during and after World War I.

7

What was the impact of Bipin Chandra Pal's imprisonment on his political career?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. He was imprisoned in 1907 and gradually withdrew from politics after release

Bipin Chandra Pal was imprisoned in 1907 for refusing to give evidence in Tilak's sedition case. After his release, he gradually withdrew from active politics. He became increasingly disillusioned with the direction of the nationalist movement. After the Surat Split, he focused more on writing and journalism. His political influence declined significantly. He became relatively less prominent in the major nationalist campaigns of the 1910s-1920s.

8

What was the 'Mahratta' newspaper and who published it?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. An English-language nationalist newspaper by Bal Gangadhar Tilak

'Mahratta' was an English-language newspaper founded by Bal Gangadhar Tilak in 1881, alongside the Marathi newspaper 'Kesari.' Through Mahratta, Tilak addressed educated Indians who read English and could influence opinion across regional boundaries. The paper took strong nationalist positions and criticized British policies. Tilak's newspapers were major platforms for the extremist faction's ideology. The British used articles from these papers as evidence in multiple sedition trials against Tilak.

9

What role did Shivaji play as a symbol in Tilak's nationalism?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. Tilak used Shivaji as a symbol of Hindu resistance against foreign rule

Bal Gangadhar Tilak used Shivaji, the 17th-century Maratha king who resisted Mughal rule, as a symbol of Hindu resistance against foreign domination. By organizing the annual Shivaji festival starting in 1896, Tilak provided a historical model for Indians resisting British rule. He argued that Shivaji's methods — even when they involved deception of enemies — were justified by the cause of liberation. The British were uncomfortable with this use of Shivaji as they saw it as incitement against authority.

10

What was the result of moderate dominance of the INC after the Surat Split?

💡

Correct Answer: A. A. The INC became less effective without the extremist energy and mass mobilization

After the Surat Split of 1907, the moderates dominated the INC but the organization became less effective without the energy and mass mobilization capacity of the extremist faction. The extremists had been the ones who inspired mass participation through the Swadeshi and Boycott movements. The INC became more of an elite organization again. The moderates' political methods produced limited results from the British. This period of diminished effectiveness continued until the Lucknow Pact of 1916 reunited the factions.