Fundamental Rights — Set 7
Indian Polity · मौलिक अधिकार · Questions 61–70 of 120
Which Article allows the State to make special provisions for women and children?
Correct Answer: B. Article 15(3)
• **Article 15(3)** = permits the State to make 'special provisions' for women and children; this is a positive/protective discrimination exception to the general anti-discrimination rule in Art.15(1). • **Scope** — Art.15(3) applies to BOTH women AND children; it is NOT limited to reservation in education/jobs. • 💡 Option A (Article 29) is wrong because Art.29 protects minority cultural and linguistic rights — not special provisions for women/children; Option C (Article 14) is wrong because Art.14 guarantees general equality — it does not specifically permit special provisions for women/children; Option D (Article 16) is wrong because Art.16 deals with equality in public employment — it does not specifically allow special provisions for women/children (that is Art.15(3)).
The 'Right to Silence' is a part of?
Correct Answer: C. Article 20(3)
• **Article 20(3)** = the 'Right to Silence' is part of this clause which protects against self-incrimination; no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. • **Scope of Silence** — the right to remain silent during police interrogation was extended in Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978); but the right does NOT protect against: blood samples, DNA tests, narco-analysis, voice samples (these are physical evidence, not testimonial). • 💡 Option A (Article 19) is wrong because Art.19 protects freedoms like speech and movement — the Right to Silence comes from Art.20(3), not Art.19; Option B (Article 22) is wrong because Art.22 protects against arbitrary arrest and provides for legal representation — not the specific right to silence against self-incrimination; Option D (Article 21) is wrong because Art.21 is the broader right to life and personal liberty — while privacy under Art.21 may have some overlap, the specific right to silence/non-self-incrimination is Art.20(3).
Which Article specifically mentions the right to 'propagate' religion?
Correct Answer: A. Article 25
• **Article 25** = explicitly mentions the right to 'propagate' religion — meaning the right to explain and spread one's religious beliefs and tenets to others. • **Propagate ≠ Convert** — the right to propagate does NOT include the right to force, coerce, or fraudulently induce someone to convert to one's religion; the State may regulate or restrict religious conversion by fraud or inducement. • 💡 Option B (Article 26) is wrong because Art.26 gives collective rights to religious denominations to manage their affairs — not individual right to propagate religion; Option C (Article 29) is wrong because Art.29 protects minority cultural and linguistic interests — not the right to propagate religion; Option D (Article 28) is wrong because Art.28 prohibits religious instruction in state-funded schools — it restricts religious teaching, not protects the right to propagate.
The Indra Sawhney case is famously known as the?
Correct Answer: B. Mandal Commission Case
• **Mandal Commission Case** = the popular name for the Indra Sawhney v. Union of India case (1992) decided by a 9-judge Supreme Court bench. • **Key Rulings** — (1) 27% OBC reservation upheld; (2) Creamy Layer among OBCs excluded; (3) total reservations capped at 50% (with extraordinary circumstances exception); (4) no reservation in promotions for OBC; (5) concept of 'backward class' based on social/educational backwardness, not just economic. • 💡 Option A (Habeas Corpus Case) is wrong because the famous Habeas Corpus case is ADM Jabalpur v. Shiv Kant Shukla (1976) during Emergency — completely unrelated to Indra Sawhney; Option C (Basic Structure Case) is wrong because the Basic Structure case is Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) — not Indra Sawhney; Option D (Privacy Case) is wrong because the Right to Privacy case is K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) — not Indra Sawhney.
Which Article protects the 'Freedom of Press'?
Correct Answer: C. Article 19(1)(a)
• **Article 19(1)(a)** = the 'Freedom of Press' is implicit (not explicitly stated) in this article which guarantees freedom of speech and expression. • **No Separate Article** — unlike the USA's First Amendment which explicitly mentions 'freedom of the press', India's Constitution has no separate article; courts have held the press has the same freedom as ordinary citizens under Art.19(1)(a); censorship, pre-publication restraint, and newspaper closure are restrictions subject to Art.19(2). • 💡 Option A (Article 14) is wrong because Art.14 guarantees equality before law — it is not the source of press freedom; Option B (Article 32) is wrong because Art.32 is the Right to Constitutional Remedies — it enforces rights but does not itself protect the press; Option D (Article 21) is wrong because Art.21 protects life and personal liberty — while courts have linked some expression rights to Art.21, the specific source of press freedom is Art.19(1)(a).
Which of the following is an exception to Equality before Law (Article 14)?
Correct Answer: A. President and Governor
• **President and Governor** = exceptions to equality before law under Article 14; they enjoy immunity from legal proceedings under Article 361 of the Constitution. • **Article 361 Immunity** — no criminal proceedings can be instituted against the President or Governor during their term; no court can issue process for their arrest or imprisonment; civil proceedings during term require 2 months' notice. • 💡 Option B (Prime Minister) is wrong because the Prime Minister has NO constitutional immunity from criminal or civil proceedings — PM can be arrested, prosecuted, and tried just like any citizen; Option C (Chief Minister) is wrong because Chief Ministers also have NO special immunity under the Constitution — they can be criminally prosecuted; Option D (Judges) is wrong because while judges have immunity for acts done in their judicial capacity, they do NOT have general immunity from all proceedings like the President/Governor under Art.361.
The right to form 'Cooperative Societies' is a?
Correct Answer: D. Fundamental Right
• **Fundamental Right** = the current status of the right to form Cooperative Societies; elevated to this status by the 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011. • **97th Amendment** — added 'cooperative societies' to Art.19(1)(c) making it a FR; also added Part IXB on cooperative societies, Art.43B as a new DPSP, and Art.51A(k) as a new Fundamental Duty. • 💡 Option A (Legal Right) is wrong because a legal right is a lower category than a FR — after the 97th Amendment it was elevated FROM a legal right TO a Fundamental Right; Option B (Directive Principle) is wrong because while Art.43B (DPSP) was also added by 97th Amendment, the RIGHT to form cooperatives is specifically a FR under Art.19(1)(c); Option C (Constitutional Right) is wrong because all FRs are constitutional rights, but FRs specifically are Part III rights enforceable by courts under Art.32 — 'constitutional right' is a broader, less precise term.
Which Article empowers Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship?
Correct Answer: D. Article 11
• **Article 11** = empowers Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by enactment — the Citizenship Act 1955 was passed under this article. • **Location** — Art.11 is in Part II (Citizenship, Arts.5-11), not Part III; it gives Parliament plenary power to make laws on acquisition and termination of citizenship. • 💡 Option A (Article 9) is wrong because Art.9 says a person who voluntarily acquires citizenship of a foreign state ceases to be an Indian citizen — it is a rule, not an empowerment of Parliament; Option B (Article 8) is wrong because Art.8 deals with rights of citizenship for certain persons of Indian origin living outside India; Option C (Article 10) is wrong because Art.10 says every person who is a citizen shall continue to be a citizen subject to Parliament's laws — it does not specifically empower Parliament to REGULATE citizenship.
The 'Right to Livelihood' is considered part of?
Correct Answer: A. Article 21
• **Article 21** = the 'Right to Livelihood' is held to be an integral part of 'right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution. • **Olga Tellis Case, 1985** — also called the 'Pavement Dwellers Case'; SC held that the right to livelihood is borne out of the right to life because no person can live without the means of living; eviction of pavement dwellers without notice violated Art.21. • 💡 Option B (Article 19) is wrong because Art.19 guarantees freedoms like speech and movement — right to livelihood is NOT one of the six enumerated freedoms under Art.19; Option C (Article 16) is wrong because Art.16 deals with equality of opportunity in public employment — it does not protect the broader right to livelihood for all; Option D (Article 14) is wrong because Art.14 guarantees equality before law — it does not specifically protect the right to earn a livelihood.
Which Article prohibits employment of children in hazardous factories?
Correct Answer: A. Article 24
• **Article 24** = prohibits employment of children below 14 years in factories, mines, or any other hazardous employment. • **Hazardous Employment** — factories and mines are explicitly mentioned; 'other hazardous employment' has been interpreted broadly; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986 and its 2016 amendment enforce this; 2016 amendment also bans child labour even in family enterprises if hazardous. • 💡 Option B (Article 23) is wrong because Art.23 prohibits trafficking in human beings and forced labour (begar) — it does not specifically mention hazardous factories and the age limit of 14; Option C (Article 22) is wrong because Art.22 protects against arbitrary arrest and detention — completely unrelated to child labour; Option D (Article 21A) is wrong because Art.21A (added by 86th Amendment 2002) deals with the Right to Education for children aged 6-14 — it is about education, not prohibition of hazardous employment.